I build software with AI agents at a scale most teams have not tried yet. UnoDOS is the proof: one operating system, 22 machines, built and verified with the methods below. I help engineering teams get the same leverage on the code they already have.
UnoDOS was built solo, greenfield, with no legacy code and no stakeholders. Your codebase is none of those things. What transfers is not the OS, it is the machinery that made an agent reliable enough to write one: explicit contracts, conformance tests, verification harnesses that catch an agent lying about its own work, and the review discipline that makes the output trustworthy without reading every line.
That machinery is what I install. It works on messy, legacy, many-stakeholder code, because that is the only kind of code most of this is worth doing on.
$400 · 90 minutes · usually booked within a week
You bring your repository and however you are using agents today. I tear it down live and tell you what is actually holding you back. You leave with a written punch list, ordered by what will move the needle first.
This is the cheap way to find out whether we should work together. If you go on to book an audit within 30 days, the fee comes off it.
$5,000 · two weeks · fixed scope, fixed price
A review of your repository and your team's workflow, delivering:
The first two engagements are $2,500. That is a real discount for a real trade: I need a testimonial and permission to write the work up as a case study. Once those two are done the price is $5,000 and stays there.
I take two audits at a time. Not a sales tactic, just arithmetic: this is hands-on work and I am one person. Past two, the only thing I can offer is day-rate advisory. If the calendar is full I will tell you that instead of taking your deposit.
Founders and engineering teams of roughly two to twenty people who have started using coding agents seriously and hit the wall where output volume stops translating into shipped work. If your problem is that agents produce a lot of code you do not trust, that is exactly the problem this addresses.
If you are evaluating whether to adopt agentic development at all, the teardown is the right first step, not the audit.
Email hello@arinbakht.com with a sentence or two about your codebase and what you have tried. I reply to everything.